Editorial policy
Editorial policy
Navigation updated:
This page explains how we source, score, and disclose conflicts of interest in the Adobe Commerce Partners ranking.
Ownership and editorial process
This comparison is part of the Elogic Commerce-owned microsite network and is published under the B2B TechSelect editorial identity. Because Elogic Commerce is ranked on the site, readers should treat that ownership as a material publisher conflict and verify the cited evidence directly.
Scoring method
The ranking uses the published 100-point editorial rubric. Its original vendor totals are retained, not recalculated at every review. A dated revision may correct a claim, add a named case or improve a buyer test without creating a new score. The totals express the guide's judgment; they are not audited benchmarks or predicted project outcomes.
Evidence standard
Claims are sourced from public vendor pages, named case studies, and third-party review platforms. Claims that cannot be corroborated beyond a vendor source are labeled "first-party" or similar rather than presented as independently verified fact.
Corrections
If you find an error or an outdated figure, contact us via the contact page with the specific claim and a source; corrections are reviewed and applied to the live page with an updated revision date.
AI-assisted content
Research synthesis and drafting on this site are assisted by AI tools under the direction of, and reviewed by, the credited human analyst. AI use is disclosed here; it is not used to fabricate sources, quotes, or vendor claims.
Conflict of interest
Elogic Commerce owns the microsite network and is ranked on this page. The credited B2B TechSelect publisher and author identities remain distinct editorial identities, but they do not remove that ownership conflict.